Why did North America and South America develop differently?
Similar pressures, different beginnings.
|
North America |
South/Central America |
Original colonies established under |
British traditions of parliamentary government, self-rule |
Iberian traditions of monarchic autocracy, strong central control |
Political independence |
Result of internal tensions and activism |
Outside conflicts create opportunity for internal uprisings to succeed |
Political System |
United States and Canadian Dominion: Constitutional republics with federal decentralization. |
Federal systems short-lived. |
Religion |
Protestantism: individualistic. |
Catholicism: institutional, Inquisitional and missionary (both conservative and progressive) |
Trade |
entrepreneurial, as well as agro-product exporter |
peripheral, importing manufactured goods and exporting raw materials |
Foreign investment |
strong domestic economy: foreign investment useful but not essential |
Limited local capital. |
Rich in natural resources, including prime agricultural land |
agricultural exports industry-related (cotton) |
low value-added food exports (esp. beef) controlled by foreign investors |
Immigration |
plantation system ends after US Civil War |
plantation labor |
Multi-racial society |
shallow binary hierarchy, but white society is largely open |
strongly hierarchical with clear creole domination |
Slavery |
Slavery replaced — with difficulty — by wage labor and sharecropping |
Slavery replaced — usually right after independence — by indentured servitude, debt peonage |
Indigenous peoples |
Steep population declines due to displacement and disease |
Steep population declines due to displacement and disease |
Women’s movement |
yes, including suffrage and social reform activism (temperance, anti-prostitution, etc.) |
not until 20c, despite strong Enlightenment-influenced Liberal movements |
© 2004, 2006 – Jonathan Dresner